home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=91TT1976>
- <title>
- Sep. 09, 1991: U.S.S.R. or B.U.S.T.
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
- Sep. 09, 1991 Power Vacuum
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- WORLD, Page 34
- SOVIET UNION
- U.S.S.R. or B.U.S.T.
- </hdr><body>
- <p> The name Union of Soviet Socialist Republics has about it the
- deep sonority of history. Unfortunately, it is history--or
- virtually so. Last week members of the Soviet parliament batted
- around suggested titles for the disintegrating union. Among the
- candidate monikers are the Union of Sovereign Soviet States (a
- Gorbachev favorite), the Euroasian Economic Community and the
- Commonwealth of Sovereign States of Europe and Asia. One cynic
- even suggested the Club of Crippled Nations.
- </p>
- <p> The problem with the Soviet Union is that each of its many
- incompatible parts may be slighted by a name that failed to take
- specific national identities into account. The solution reached
- by Pakistan (an initial from each of its eight component regions)
- would be ideal--except for the fact that there are 12 republics
- to deal with. The acronyms are hardly euphonious or politic.
- Turgutmakbak, for example, simply turns the new confederation
- into gobbledygook. Using syllables from some of the republics
- would be just as untenable. For example, the Belokazakirghuzbek
- Russukra Union (B.R.U.) would leave out the easily offended
- states of Tadzhikistan, Turkmenistan, Moldavia, Georgia, Armenia
- and Azerbaijan. And what would the country's inhabitants be
- called? Bruskis?
- </p>
- <p> The demise of the initials U.S.S.R. will mean that one
- classic Beatles tune will become archaic. But initials are tricky
- things. The Soviets (or ex-Soviets, as the case may be) should be
- careful not to name their country the Basically United Sovereign
- Territories.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-